Is Kal K. Korff letting business get in the way of accountability?

A few days ago I asked why it was not ok for some to call people like Kevin Randle "credible" but it was ok for others. Kal K. Korff has said people referring to this Kevin Randle fellow as credible are committing consumer fraud. Oddly enough the person who runs a radio show called Xzone named Rob McConnel had Kevin Randle as a guest on the show and Rob McConnel said Kevin Randle was credible.

So why does Kal not accuse Rob McConnel of committing consumer fraud as he has with others who have said Kevin Randle is credible?

Kal says he is the "bureau chief" for this Xzone show. Kal is given a regularly scheudled spot each week on the Xzone show. And then I found this and took a picture of it.
This Xzone show sells iPods and it appears that Kal might possibly have a business arrangement with this Xzone show to sell iPods. You can see this video for yourself.

If Kal does have a business arrangement with Rob McConnel then one might think it to be a conflict of interest for Kal as this Xzone show has a lot of flying saucer believers, bigfoot believers, ghost people, and the like on it.

So has Kal K. Korff sold out to make money and have a spot on a radio show or will he hold everyone to the same standards he claims to use on everyone? You cannot have it both ways Kal. If you are going to be a champion for consumers then you must be above any sort of activity that would present a conflict of interest.

I personally do not think Rob McConnel is committing any type of fraud but Kal must be even in his application of standards and this would include applying those same standards on Rob McConnel.

Kal K. Korff EXPOSED for his hypocrisy, placing self interest before that of consumers!

I can't think of much else that truly sickens me than an asshole who is also an utter hypocrite. Yes I am talking again about Kal K. Korff and his "standards" and laughable ethics. It works with Kal this way in that if you happen to not agree with him you are targeted as a fraud. But if it is something that is so clearly wrong but Kal doesn't care for the facts of the situation then Kal will use that mightily warped logic of his to "justify" the means to his own end.

Kal has been on bat shit rant of late with this whole shooting business where Kal is using conspiracy theories and blaming everyone else for what happened. Kal even says that people involved in this are not following the rule of law and Kal goes on his usual diatribe of disjointed reasoning and faulty logic to "justify" his view so he can be right. kal is even taking an old play out of the conspiracy nuts play book by screaming COVER UP!

Kal's brother was tried and convicted in a court of law for what some say is a felony criminal act. Kal said it was all a coverup since his brother was convicted. Kal says this in SPITE of the FACT that taxpayers paid $90,000 for his brother's defense and some big CSI investigator did an independent analysis. Kal's broher's lawyer was given an equal opportunity under the law to provide a defense. Kal ADMITS in his now DEFUNCT column that the cops were in the right stopping the car Kal's brother tried to use to run over a cop. And now the WORLD HAS WITNESSED Kal ALTER his story a few times now about what really happened. Which version will it be this week Kal? You see there is Kal's "truth" and then there's THE truth and Kal's version of events usually crumbles on closer inspection. That and Kal can't keep his own story straight when he attempts to MISLEAD CONSUMERS. What fishing story will Kal INSULT consumers with next? You should have worked for the O.J. Simpson defense team Kal with that imagination of yours.

Kal first made the statement that his brother was just an innocent hitch hiker picked up by a bunch of strangers who happened to have just committed a crime and then AMAZINGLY Kal later CONFESSED that his brother was in a car full of his own friends and that his brother should choose his friends more carefully. So if the police "rightfully" pulled over the car according to Kal there really is nothing to dispute.

This basically boils down to Korff's brother tried to run over a cop and the cop defended himself as any human being in that situation would. The car was "rightfully" stopped by the police according to Kal's own words. Kal's brother was in the car AGAIN according to Kal's OWN WORDS! An outstanding warrant had been issued by a judge for the arrest of Korff's brother. Korff's brother jumped from the passenger seat into the driver's seat and tried to escape from the cops. Kal even said his brother should not have tried to leave!!

By Korff's own logic and statements regarding the rules of law then his brother should have followed the law and peacefully turned himself over to the cops. Had Korff's brother not acted with such wanton disregard for the law and the life of the cop he tried to mow down with a car and had Kal's brother chose to follow the law then NONE of this would have happened! If Korff wants to hold someone accountable then he should be holding his own brother responsible for his behavior that set these events into motion. While he's at it perhaps Kal should assess how much his brother's action have cost law abiding consumers.

You can't have it both ways Kal you repugnant hypocrite. Your DOUBLE STANDARDS have been EXPOSED to consumers WORLDWIDE! Kal is unfit to champion consumers with his two-faced standards and unwillingness to be objective in his own brother's criminal actions! How can we trust Kal to champion consumers when it is very evident that Kal will place his own wants and desires and his spite before the needs of honest consumers? You can't.

The countless FAILURES of Kalvin Korff #12

There's nothing worse than a hypocrite. I truly cannot tolerate those presenting a self righteous exterior when the ugly truth is that they're worse than the people they pretend to condemn. Kal K. Korff is among the worst when it comes to hypocrites.

Kal has repeatedly accused others of uneven standards and of being selective in their truths. Kal has made it clear we cannot tolerate anyone promoting flying saucer or other nonsense.

How do you think Kal would feel about a chap who takes advertising money from a guy who claims the world is being controlled by lizard people and has written books about it?

It appears that Xzone radio show host Rob McConnel is doing just that. This rather bizarre fellow named David Icke says lizard people are actually running the world! And where else does this David Icke fellow advertise himself? On the Rob McConnel radio show website. Here is a picture I took of the website showing the advertisement for David Icke.
So is Rob McConnel not promoting this David Icke fellow by allowing him to advertise on this Xzone website? I find the whole idea of lizard people running the world to be absurd. Why is Kal not holding this Rob McConnel chap to the same set of standards Kal holds others?

If Kal doesn't hold Rob McConnel to the same standard then this must mean Kal endorses the views of David Icke as genuine and others advertising or appearing on the Rob McConnel show. If Kal doesn't hold the views of David Icke as genuine, then why has Kal not drawn the line and held Rob McConnel responsible to the same level Kal has held Kevin Randle and others?

Kal accuses Kevin Randle and many other people of fraud. While I do not think Rob McConnel is committing fraud and is just a guy who hosts a show, my understanding of Kal's standard is anyone promoting ideas, people, or making money off either that Kal believes to be fraudulent, those people are engaging in consumer fraud. If Rob McConnel is accepting advertising money from someone Kal believes to be a fraud, or if Rob McConnel is promoting them through advertising then Rob McConnel is by Kal's standard committing consumer fraud. I only think Rob McConnel is a radio show guy and I believe he is not committing fraud by putting on a radio show or letting people advertise on his show.

If Kal is going to let this slide, then Kal is a just another hypocrite in a world full of them. If Kal's self imposed ethics are as strong as he claims and if he is a real champion of consumers, then Kal would not hesitate to turn his sights on Rob McConnel.

But the sad, painful reality is Kal K. Korff is a hypocrite GUILTY of the same charges he levels at others. Kal is unfit to represent consumers in any manner so long as his ethics and standards can be bought for a spot on a radio show. Not only is Kal K. Korff a HYPOCRITE he is also a SELLOUT who can be bought for some publicity and a little attention all at the expense of consumers worldwide.

The dilemma of Kalvin Korff

Someone posting in the comments section brought up a rather interesting point. Seems Kalvin Korff has placed himself in a very tough situation. A chap named Don Ecker popped up in the regular spot of an Internet radio show that is usually occupied by our dear Kalvin. This radio show is called the X Zone and its host is a fellow named Rob McConnell.

Kalvin has proclaimed that Kevin Randle is committing fraud and is a liar. Kalvin has proclaimed that this Royce Meyer fellow commits consumer fraud by promoting Kevin Randle as "being credible." Kalvin also damns Don Ecker's credibility as marginal at best.

Where does this all lead, one might be asking. This leads Kalvin into a simple though I'm sure rather frustrating moral dilemma. Since Kalvin lamblasts Royce Meyers for calling Kevin Randle "credible"then here is Kalvin's problem.

When this Don Ecker chap appeared on this X Zone show in Kalvin's usually scheduled slot, radio host Rob McConnell called both Kevin Randle and Don Ecker credible. So the question now is will Kalvin Korff hold Rob McConnell to the same standard as Kalvin holds others? With mere utterance of the word directed in such favorable fashion to Don Ecker and Kevin Randle, isn't Rob McConnell now committing consumer fraud according to Kalvin's own standards? Isn't this Rob McConnell fellow now as "guilty" as the others, Kalvin? I'm not saying Rob McConnell is committing consumer fraud or doing anything else wrong, but I am posing a rather serious question to Kalvin Korff about his so-called "standards" and "morals." I've seen the list of some of the people that are on the X Zone and they don;t seem to be very "scientific" and seems to be rather flying saucer and new age types to me. How does Kalvin still appear on that show with all of those same types of people he has spoken out against?

So what shall it be Kalvin? Risk your spot on the only radio show that would host a loon like you on a regularly scheduled basis? Or stand by the "moral code" you foist unto others and proclaim Rob McConnell a fraud as you have Kevin Ranlde, Royce Meyer, Don Ecker and others?

I guess we get to see just how high your standards and morals are, or aren't. Will Kalvin risk his spot on the X Zone show or will he fold so he can keep the only soap box he has other than his pathetic website to stand on?